FREE CONSULTATIONS

NO FEE UNLESS I RECOVER MONEY FOR YOU

(215) 569 - 1455 tom@gibbonslegal.com

RECENT NOTABEL VICTORIES

$1,100,000.00 verdict for a drunk motorcyclist who suffered a traumatic brain injury when a motor vehicle suddenly and without warning exited an adjacent parking lot directly into his lane of travel, forcing him to dump his motorcycle and fall to the ground.  At the time of the accident, my client was more than double the legal intoxication limit and was not wearing a helmet as required by Pennsylvania law.  I was able to preclude the defense from introducing this damning information into evidence, which ultimately helped win our case.  Believing my client caused the accident and his injuries, the defense chose not to make any settlement offers.

 

$235,000.00 settlement for two motorists (the driver and front-seat passenger) who suffered multiple fractures and other injuries in a motor vehicle accident in which another motorist forced their motor vehicle off the road and directly into a 100-year-old tree.

 

$140,000.00 lump sum payment (workers' compensation settlement) for a UPS driver who fractured his leg when he fell off his truck during a routine delivery.

 

$95,000.00 verdict for a limited-tort motorist who suffered minor back injuries when another motor vehicle side swiped his motor vehicle.  Prior to the 3-day jury trial, and again during the jury deliberations, the defense offered only $5,000.00 for a full and final settlement.  This offer was, of course, rejected.

 

$85,000.00 lump sum payment (workers' compensation settlement) for a construction worker who fractured his ankle when he fell from scafolding.

Medical Malpractice

Medical malpractice occurs when a health care provider acts or fails to act within the accepted standards of care within the medical community and causes injury to the patient.

 

The most common cause of action for medical malpractice is medical negligence.  To succeed in such a claim, the injured patient must prove the following:

 

 

1.  The health care provider had a legal duty to protect the patient from

     harm.  Often times, to prove this element, the patient need only prove

     that the health care provider undertook care or treatment of the patient.

 

2.  The health care provider breached that duty (i.e., failed to conform to the

     relevant standard of care within the medical community).  Often times, to

     prove this element, the patient will need to retain an expert in the

     relevant medical care to testify to the errors committed by the health care

     professional.  Sometimes, however, the negligence is so obvious that the

     law infers negligence.  This is called res ipsa loquitor (i.e., the injury speaks

     for itself'), and it applies in situations like where a surgeon operates on the

     wrong body part.

 

3.  The health care provider's breach was a proximate cause of the patient's

     injury.

 

4.  The patient suffered some sort of damages as a result of the injury, which

     include financial losses (e.g., lost wages, medical expenses, and life care

     expenses) and  physical and psychological harm (e.g., loss of a limb or

     organ, reduced enjoyment of life, pain and suffering, and emotional

     distress).  in some cases, the patient may also be entitled to punitive

     damages, which are only awarded when the health care provider acts

     wantonly and recklessly.